tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8708273719674528189.post246561128943109092..comments2024-03-22T00:20:38.510-07:00Comments on Adam Riggio writes: Philosophical-Historical Triangulation: Sartre-Hegel, Research Time, 15/09/2013Adam Riggiohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14606510835439580828noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8708273719674528189.post-72979817742426609912013-09-16T07:07:01.908-07:002013-09-16T07:07:01.908-07:00On your last point, you might think of misprision,...On your last point, you might think of misprision, the notion that authors inevitably misread their influences/ productive misreading. <br /><br />The difference between Hegel and Sartre is to my mind a classical consensus vs. conflict set of expectations. Hegel is uncomfortable with conflict and wants to explain it away; Sartre is uncomfortable with consensus/ conformity and wants to explain that away. Sartre's productive misreading of Hegel is to assume that there is some positive dimension to extraneous conflict in Hegel's imaginary. <br /><br />Now that I write that, I'm not sure how useful the concept it.<br /><br />But you haven't posted for today, so that's all you'll get!Tom Crosbiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04942888225118081569noreply@blogger.com